https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159402010
When do interfaces become important for failure?
1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA
2 School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
a Corresponding author: saryuj@lanl.gov
Published online: 7 September 2015
Previous experimental research has shown that microstructural features such as interfaces, inclusions, vacancies and heterogeneities can all act as void nucleation sites. However, it is not well understood how important these interfaces are to the damage evolution as a function of the surrounding parent materials. In this work, we present results on three different materials: 1) Cu, 2) Cu-10 wt%Ag, and 3) Cu-15 wt%Nb examined to probe the influence of bi-metal interfaces on void nucleation and evolution. These materials were chosen due to the differences in the stacking fault energy between the two phases. The initial results suggest that when there are significant differences between the bulk properties (for example: stacking fault energy and melting temperature etc) the type of interface between the two parent materials does not influence the damage process. Rather, it is the “weaker” material that dictates the dynamic spall strength of the material.
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
