https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714608007
IAEA coordinated research project on nuclear data for charged-particle monitor reactions and medical isotope production
1 NAPC-Nuclear Data Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
2 University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
3 Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), USA
4 Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
5 Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium
6 Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
7 Institute of Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE), Obninsk, Russia
8 Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNHB), CEA Saclay, France
9 Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia
10 Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea
11 Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), USA
12 Nuclear Physics Institute, Rez, Czech Republic
13 National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering “Horia Hulubei”, Romania
14 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Trombay, Mumbai, India
15 Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokaimura Naka, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
16 Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Germany
17 Institute of Nuclear Research, Debrecen, Hungary
a e-mail: Roberto.CapoteNoy@iaea.org
Published online: 13 September 2017
An IAEA coordinated research project was launched in December 2012 to establish and improve the nuclear data required to characterise charged-particle monitor reactions and extend data for medical radionuclide production. An international team was assembled to undertake work addressing the requirements for more accurate cross-section data over a wide range of targets and projectiles, undertaken in conjunction with a limited number of measurements and more extensive evaluations of the decay data of specific radionuclides. These studies are nearing completion, and are briefly described below.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.